PUT AWAY YOUR CALCULATORS AND CALENDARS! (Revelation – Part 3)

blood moon - lunar eclipse

Photo Courtesy Dennis Johnson


However, no one knows the day or hour when these things will happen, not even the angels in heaven or the Son himself. Only the Father knows. [Matthew 24:36 (NLT)]

I couldn’t finish writing about Revelation without a caution to beware of end times predictions. If someone claims to have secret knowledge or frightens you with their teaching—abandon them ASAP! If Jesus didn’t know when the end would occur, I can guarantee that no mortal will!

Nevertheless, in 1994, radio evangelist Harold Camping predicted the world would end on September 6. When it didn’t, explaining his mistake was a mathematical error, Camping got out his calculator again and predicted the apocalypse would begin precisely at 5:59 PM, May 21, 2011. At that time, those chosen by God would ascend to heaven in the Rapture and cataclysmic earthquakes would rock the earth. After finding himself still here May 22, Camping admitted his understanding of God’s plan was slightly off but continued predicting the world’s end on October 21. When October 22 dawned, the evangelist confessed such predictions were “incorrect and sinful” and finally conceded that God might not tell people the date of Christ’s return. Camping’s apology, however, was little comfort to his followers who’d given up jobs and families to warn people of God’s coming judgment!

Because Joel 2:31 and Revelation 6:12 describe the sun growing dark and the moon turning red as blood before the great day the Lord arrives, we frequently read of “blood moon” predictions! A “blood moon” is a total lunar eclipse during which we see the moon slowly darken and change color from bright white to an orange-red coppery color. Not a rare event, one occurred last November and another will in 2025. On September 28, 2015, however, the fourth such lunar eclipse occurred within two years (a “tetrad event”) and coincided with the Jewish celebration of Sukkot. The concurrence isn’t surprising since Sukkot always occurs on the first full moon following the autumn equinox. Nevertheless, this caused some Christian evangelists to warn of imminent world-shaking events or that the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse would reveal their missions. They didn’t! Nevertheless, we’ll probably hear more tribulation prophecies in 2033 when the last full moon in the tetrad occurs on October 8—the first day of Sukkot!

Because Revelation calls “666” the number of the Beast, people try to use 666 to predict the end. Although Revelation’s message shouldn’t frighten believers, many Christians in 17th-century Europe feared the world’s end in 1666. When the Great London Fire that year destroyed much of the city, they thought it the end of the world but, since it lasted only four days and left only ten dead, that wasn’t much of an end!

To determine the Beast’s name, some people use gematria (a system of assigning numeric values to letters or words in the Hebrew language). Although originally limited to Hebrew, they also use Greek, Latin, English, or whatever suits them. Depending on the language, whether first and/or last name is used, and the number of mathematical applications employed, just about any name can be made to total 666 (including Nero Caesar, Julius Caesar, Domitian, Vespasian, Caligula, Mohammed, Pope Benedict IX, Luther, Ronald Reagan, and Mikhail Gorbachev). Don’t fret about 666 or its meaning. We aren’t going to know the Beast’s identity until it appears but we’ll recognize the Beast by the mark!

Last week I wrote about the Episcopal priest Jeopardy contestant and his easy dismissal of Revelation. His dismissal is understandable. False prophecies, outlandish predictions, and farfetched interpretations of Revelation bring shame and ridicule to John’s vision and, by extension, to Jesus. False rapture and end-of-the-world predictions do more than embarrass and discredit the false prophet, they dishonor the Lord and the Christian doctrine of Christ’s return!

It is only by studying Revelation that we can maintain both our hope in the return of Jesus and dispel the doomsday delusions of today’s false prophets. Let us remember that God doesn’t want us to speculate about the timing of His return; He wants us to remain faithful, righteous, watchful, and ready. In the meantime, rather than being sign watchers, we should be disciple makers!

So when the apostles were with Jesus, they kept asking him, “Lord, has the time come for you to free Israel and restore our kingdom?” He replied, “The Father alone has the authority to set those dates and times, and they are not for you to know. But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit comes upon you. And you will be my witnesses, telling people about me everywhere—in Jerusalem, throughout Judea, in Samaria, and to the ends of the earth.” [Acts 1:6-8 (NLT)]

Copyright ©2023 jsjdevotions. All rights reserved.

NOT TO BE IGNORED (Revelation – Part 1)

Behold, I am telling you a mystery; we will not all sleep, but we will all be changed, in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet; for the trumpet will sound, and the dead will be raised imperishable, and we will be changed. [1 Corinthians 15:51-52 (NASB)]

little blue heronWhen researching another devotion, I learned that a Jeopardy contestant missed this $1,000 clue: “It’s the ascension heavenward by true Christians both living & dead at Christ’s second coming.” Although the answer was the Rapture, the contestant, an Episcopal priest, remained silent. He later explained that he didn’t believe in the Rapture or hold to a literal reading of Revelation, adding that the literal reading of Revelation is a “a product of the modern era.” His words gave me pause.

In the decades I attended denominational churches, I never heard any reference to the Rapture and can’t recall ever hearing a sermon about the tribulation or Christ’s return. While I’d read bits and pieces of Revelation, it seemed so bizarre after the first three chapters that I thought the Apostle John might have imbibed in the 1st century version of LSD. It was not until I began attending more evangelical and Bible-based churches that I became familiar with both the Rapture and Revelation.

Although not found in Scripture, the word “rapture” comes from the Latin rapiõ meaning “to seize, snatch away,” which is equivalent to the Greek word harpazõ or “caught up” that is found in 1 Thessalonians 4:13-18 and 1 Corinthians 15:50-52. In the Rapture, dead and living believers will be caught up together to meet Jesus in the clouds to make way for God’s judgment and wrath that will be poured out on the earth during the Tribulation. Because Scripture is unclear about how and when this will occur, Paul called it a mystērion—something that only can be known through God’s revelation. Being a mystery, however, doesn’t mean something like it won’t happen.

While there is general agreement throughout the Church about the resurrection of the dead and Christ’s return, there is a diversity of thoughts about the particulars. Unlike essential doctrine in which Christians have unity (e.g. the forgiveness of sins and Christ’s deity, death, and resurrection), there’s plenty of liberty about the specifics of the end times and Christ’s return. That Episcopal priest is just one of many Christians who don’t believe in the Rapture.

My issue is with the priest’s easy dismissal of Revelation. Perhaps he’s like a mainstream pastor friend who questions whether Revelation belongs in the Bible. Even though the New Testament canon was not firmly established until 397, the book of Revelation was considered part of the Church’s holy Scriptures in the early stages of Christianity. It was listed as part of the canon around 180 AD in both Irenaeus’ Against Heresies and on the Muratorian Fragment. Church fathers like Irenaeus (bishop of Lyons), Papias (bishop of Hierapolis), Theophilus (bishop of Antioch), Justin Martyr, Tertullian, and Clement of Alexandria all accepted the Apocalypse as revealed in John’s vision.

While a renewed interest in Revelation may be “a product of the modern era,” the earliest church fathers like Irenaeus and Justin Martyr took a literal view of the thousand-year reign with Christ. It was only after Constantine awarded full legal recognition and favor to the Christian church in 313 and Christianity became the official religion of the Roman Empire in 380 that the focus of the church changed. No longer being persecuted for their faith, Christians went from looking for their ultimate comfort in the world beyond the grave to seeking comfort in this world. As believers became more content in the here and now, they became less eager for the Apocalypse, God’s future judgment, and Jesus’ return.

While we don’t know whether the end is near or in another 2,000 years, we should look to Christ’s promised return. As the final chapter of our salvation, Revelation never should be ignored, scorned, or forgotten. It can be confusing, intimidating, and mind-boggling at times, and we’ll probably never fully understand it. Nevertheless, Revelation is worth reading; after all, it’s the only book in the Bible promising a blessing to those who read its words and do what it says!

Blessed is the one who reads, and those who hear the words of the prophecy and keep the things which are written in it; for the time is near. [Revelation 1:3 (NASB)]

Copyright ©2023 jsjdevotions. All rights reserved.

REVERENCE AND RESPECT [1 Samuel 4 to 6 (Part 2)]

The Ark remained in Kiriath-jearim for a long time—twenty years in all. During that time all Israel mourned because it seemed the Lord had abandoned them. [1 Samuel 7:2 (NLT)]

As we settled into our pews in the sanctuary, people talked loudly, called out to one another, laughed raucously, visited other pews, and checked their phones even after the organist started his beautiful prelude. It wasn’t until the pastor stood at the pulpit and started speaking that they eventually quieted down and put away their phones. As I wondered what became of the awe and reverence that should accompany us into God’s house, I again thought of the time Israel brought the sacred Ark of the Covenant into battle with them. Putting aside their idolatry, consider the lack of respect given to this religious chest designed by God and representing His presence among His people.

After being defeated by the Philistines, Israel blatantly disregarded the law that the Ark was to remain in the Tabernacle’s Holy of Holies in Shiloh and brought it to their camp in Ebenezer. Rather than treating it with the reverence due the most sacred object in the land, they loudly cheered the Ark’s arrival as if it were a team mascot. Pagan armies carried their gods into battle with them and, when they carried the Ark into battle the next day, the Israelites were no different than the pagan Philistines. Their sacrilege ended with defeat and 30,000 dead.

In the ancient world, the gods of the defeated were carried off by the victors and the Philistines took their battle trophy to their temple in Ashod. Thinking Israel’s god was in the box, they placed the Ark in the temple to serve as a secondary god to their major deity Dagon. The great God Jehovah, however, is second to none and He is not to be treated disrespectfully. When things went from bad to worse for the Philistines, they finally decided to return the Ark to Israel. Accompanied by a guilt offering of golden tumors and rats like the ones that probably ravaged their land with a plague, the Ark was returned to the Israelite city of Beth-shemesh.

The people of Beth-shemesh were overjoyed at the Ark’s return but, instead of treating it as the sacred object it was, they treated it as a curiosity. The inquisitive men opened the Ark and looked into it. This sacrilege was a serious violation of the law. As descendants of Aaron, the men of Beth-shemesh were priests and knew that they were prohibited from looking in the Ark “for even a moment.” Regardless of intentions, even touching (let alone opening) the Ark was punishable by death. When 70 men (some translations say 50,070) were struck down for this sacrilege, like the Philistines, the people of Beth-shemesh wanted to get rid of the Ark as soon as possible. What they failed to comprehend was that the Ark didn’t cause those deaths; it was the people’s impious, thoughtless, and reckless behavior that did!

Men from Kiriath-jearim came for the Ark but, rather than taking it back to the Tabernacle in Shiloh where it belonged, they took it to the home of Abinadab. Stored unceremoniously as if it were an old trunk in the attic, it remained there for twenty years.

Which brings me back to the noisy sanctuary last week. While church should be a welcoming place, it seems that we’ve shifted from relaxed, friendly, and unintimidating to irreverent, cavalier, and rude. A neighbor has noticed the same thing in her church.

A sanctuary is a sacred place set aside for worship—it may be in a large cathedral, small church, rustic chapel, park, living room, arena, auditorium, school room, or store front. Nevertheless, wherever it is, God demands (and certainly deserves) reverence and respect. Do we approach the sanctuary with awesome wonder at being welcomed into God’s house or do we irreverently give no thought at all to where and why we’re there? Does our behavior in church honor and glorify God? Does it reveal our gratitude for worshipping freely, safely, and openly; for hearing God’s word and singing His praises; and for sharing the Eucharist with our brothers and sisters in Christ? It should.

Israel “mourned because it seemed that the Lord had abandoned them” and it was twenty years before they repented of their behavior. God, however, had never abandoned them; they had abandoned Him when they stopped revering Him and started treating His Ark with disrespect and contempt. May we never make the mistake of treating our place of worship (His house) the same way!

You must keep my Sabbath days of rest and show reverence for my sanctuary. I am the Lord. [Leviticus 26:2 (NLT)]

Since we are receiving a Kingdom that is unshakable, let us be thankful and please God by worshiping him with holy fear and awe. [Hebrews 12:28 (NLT)]

Copyright ©2023 jsjdevotions. All rights reserved.

WHATEVER IT TAKES

But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit comes upon you. And you will be my witnesses, telling people about me everywhere—in Jerusalem, throughout Judea, in Samaria, and to the ends of the earth. [Acts 1:8 (NLT)]

Church of Columba - Spiez

“We will do anything short of sin to reach those who don’t know Christ,” was frequently said by the pastor of the mountain church at which we worshiped during our Colorado winters. His passionate words reflect the sort of zeal that mountain church has for reaching the unreached.

In Mark’s gospel, we find four men willing to do anything (short of sin) to bring someone to Christ. Jesus was in Capernaum where he previously healed the sick and demon-possessed. Upon hearing the news that Jesus had returned, these four men placed their paralyzed friend on a mat and carried him to the house where the Lord was preaching. Unfortunately, but the house was so mobbed that they couldn’t even get in the door! Unwilling to let a crowd of people keep their sick friend from Jesus, the men carried him up to the roof. While they didn’t sin, I’m not so sure they didn’t break the law when they dug up the thatch and dry mud, removed the tiles, and made a hole in the roof through which they lowered their paralyzed friend to Jesus’ feet.

Timothy certainly went “the extra mile” when the young man underwent circumcision just to become a more effective evangelist to the Jews. In obedience to the Spirit’s direction to go south to the Gaza road, Philip actually walked an extra 42 miles before even getting to that desert road and finally meeting the Ethiopian! His miles, however, pale in comparison to Paul’s! New Testament scholar Dr. Eckhard Schnabel estimates that Paul logged over 15,500 evangelism miles before arriving in Rome in 60 AD. 6,800 of those miles were by sea and another 8,700 were on land (presumably done on foot). Along with the blisters and callouses resulting from all that walking, Paul endured things like imprisonment, shipwrecks, being adrift at sea, whippings, beatings, imprisonment, and being stoned along with bandits, hunger, thirst, bad weather, and attacks from Jews, Gentiles, and false believers. Nevertheless, even when imprisoned, the Apostle relentlessly continued to spread the gospel of Christ in his letters.

Even after Herod ordered James’ death “by sword,” the first believers never stopped doing all they could to bring people to Christ. When Stephen was called before the high council, he knew his words would provoke them. Nevertheless, he courageously witnessed for Jesus until his last breath. Although Peter and John were beaten, imprisoned, and told to stop preaching, they continued to lead people to Jesus. The early church was determined to bring people to the Lord.

Jesus gave us a “great” commission (not a small one) when he told us to go into the world and preach the good news of God’s grace and love. Rather than a suggestion, that was an order and meant to be obeyed! When fulfilling His command, we’re not likely to endure things like circumcision, beatings, imprisonment, bandits, shipwreck, breaking through rooftops, or martyrdom. We don’t have to log over 15,000 travel miles or even walk 42 miles out of the way. Philip didn’t go far to bring Nathanael to the Lord and the woman at the well just ran back into town to bring people to Jesus!

The first believers were willing to do whatever it took to bring people to the Lord. Are today’s believers willing to do the same? Are we willing to leave our own personal comfort zone to bring light into darkness? Great things happened when Andrew invited his brother (Simon Peter) to meet Jesus. Are we even willing to ask our neighbors to church?

Evangelism is not a professional job for a few trained men, but is instead the unrelenting responsibility of every person who belongs to the company of Jesus. [D. Elton Trueblood]

Jesus came and told his disciples, “I have been given all authority in heaven and on earth. Therefore, go and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit.” [Matthew 28;18-19 (NLT)]

Copyright ©2023 jsjdevotions. All rights reserved.

WAS IT HYPOCRITICAL? 

Timothy was well thought of by the believers in Lystra and Iconium, so Paul wanted him to join them on their journey. In deference to the Jews of the area, he arranged for Timothy to be circumcised before they left, for everyone knew that his father was a Greek. [Acts 16:2-3 (NLT)]

green heronIn Acts 16, we meet Timothy, the son of a Greek Gentile and a devout Jewish woman. Paul probably met him several years earlier when he preached in Lystra or Derbe. Both Timothy and his mother were Christ followers and it was from his mother that Timothy became knowledgeable in the Hebrew Scriptures. By the time Paul returned to Lystra, Timothy was a young man who was well-regarded by the churches in Lystra and neighboring Iconium. Seeing his potential, Paul asked the young man to join him on his second missionary journey. Before departing, however, Paul asked Timothy to be circumcised.

Considering the Apostle’s vehement disagreement with the legalists in Antioch, his appeal to the Jerusalem Council, and his letter to the Galatians that clearly stated his opposition to making circumcision a requirement for salvation, Paul’s strange request seems the height of hypocrisy to a 21st century Christian. It certainly did to me until I considered Paul’s request from a 1st century Jewish point of view.

Making the transition from an exclusive group united by blood, language, Torah, tradition, and circumcision into a group that was expansive and inclusive could not have been easy for the Jewish believers. Mosaic law purposely set apart Israel from the pagan nations around them. The Torah regulated what could be eaten, how it was to be butchered, what could be done on the Sabbath, and designated what was clean and unclean. Unlike Gentiles, Jews had mezuzahs on their doorposts, were to recite the Shema twice a day, and say grace after meals. Most important, as the outward physical sign of the eternal covenant between God and Abraham, circumcision was seen as essential to being one of the covenant people.

Finding it difficult to set aside their Hebrew heritage, most new Jewish believers continued to observe Jewish customs and laws after becoming followers of Christ. A problematic group were the legalists and Judaizers with their false doctrine that circumcision and observance of the Law were necessary for salvation. Other new believers, however, were separatists. While not insisting that Gentiles observe the law, they continued to faithfully observe it themselves and distanced themselves from Gentile believers. There also were traditionalists among these new believers. Although they associated with Gentile believers, they continued to observe the familiar customs of Judaism. Even Paul, who mixed with and preached to Gentiles, continued to live as an observant Jew and urged others to “remain as you were when God called you.” [1 Co. 7:17] For Paul, being a good Christian didn’t mean he had to be a bad Jew!

As a believer, Timothy was saved, so Paul’s request wasn’t a matter of his salvation; it was a matter of Timothy’s ability to evangelize. The young man was the product of a mixed marriage—something frowned upon by Jews. Although his father was a Gentile Greek, his mother was a Jew which meant Timothy was a Jew and, as a Jew, he should have been circumcised! Without this rite, other Jews would view Timothy as an apostate Jew or a Gentile. Paul often preached in synagogues where neither apostate Jew nor Gentile would be welcome. Paul’s request wasn’t theological; it was pragmatic. Out of dedication to his calling and respect for the Jews, the young man was circumcised so that he could witness for Christ in the synagogues. Timothy became a “Jew” to the Jews so that he could bring the Jews to Jesus!

Even though I am a free man with no master, I have become a slave to all people to bring many to Christ. When I was with the Jews, I lived like a Jew to bring the Jews to Christ. When I was with those who follow the Jewish law, I too lived under that law. Even though I am not subject to the law, I did this so I could bring to Christ those who are under the law. When I am with the Gentiles who do not follow the Jewish law, I too live apart from that law so I can bring them to Christ. But I do not ignore the law of God; I obey the law of Christ. [1 Corinthians 9:19-21 (NLT)]

Copyright ©2023 jsjdevotions. All rights reserved.

UNITY, LIBERTY, AND CHARITY

“For the Lord gave us this command when he said, ‘I have made you a light to the Gentiles, to bring salvation to the farthest corners of the earth.’” When the Gentiles heard this, they were very glad and thanked the Lord for his message; and all who were chosen for eternal life became believers. So the Lord’s message spread throughout that region. Then the Jews stirred up the influential religious women and the leaders of the city, and they incited a mob against Paul and Barnabas and ran them out of town.  [Acts 13:47-50 (NLT)]

swamp lilyI think Satan chuckles every time he sees another division in Christ’s church. He probably shouted with glee when the Southern Baptist Convention recently expelled five congregations (including the mega Saddleback church) and when the no-longer-united United Methodists lost 1,800 congregations and found themselves embroiled in lawsuits with many of those congregations. Although Methodist Bishop Tom Berlin sadly noted that, “The path of anger and hostility is not the Christian way,” it seems to have become the way of Christ’s church in the 21st century! While today’s issues are different, they are no less divisive than an issue that threatened the very existence of the early church.

The book of Acts opens with the apostles witnessing “throughout Judea, in Samaria, and to the ends of the earth” (or at least as far as Galatia). Philip preached in Samaria as did Peter and John. After converting an Ethiopian and sending the gospel message south beyond Egypt, Philip brought the gospel north to the mixed population of Caesarea. Peter brought the Good News to the Gentile household of Cornelius in Caesarea and believers who fled Judea after Stephen’s death brought the word of God as far as Phoenicia, Cyprus, and Antioch of Syria. While some preached only to the Jews, Paul and Barnabas preached the gospel to both Jews and Gentiles in Antioch of Pisidia and throughout Pamphylia before returning to Antioch of Syria.

Although the new church accepted the conversion of the Gentiles, not everyone was happy about it. Some Jewish believers saw the inclusion of Gentiles as a dilution of Judaism rather than an expansion of Christ’s church. While Paul and Barnabas were in Antioch, a group of legalists arrived. Sometimes called Judaizers, they taught that Mosaic law must be followed by Gentiles and insisted upon circumcision as a requirement for the Gentiles’ salvation. Paul and Barnabas vehemently disagreed. This wasn’t a simple matter of life-style or manner or worship in which the two sides could agree to disagree. It was a matter of doctrine! Setting adherence to Mosaic law and circumcision as prerequisites for salvation was a denial of God’s grace! This issue threatened to divide and possibly defeat the new church.

Paul and Barnabas came to Jerusalem to settle the matter around 49 or 50 AD and the Apostles and church leaders held the Jerusalem Council. Peter got down to basics by pointing out where they all agreed—all are saved by “the undeserved grace of the Lord Jesus.” After Paul and Barnabas confirmed the presence of the Spirit in the new Gentile believers, James reminded the Council of the words of Amos and his prophecy of a Messianic kingdom that would include Gentiles. Understanding that God’s plan of redemption included all nations, the Council agreed that unnecessary burdens should not be laid on the Gentiles.

While the Council rejected the view of the legalists, they also understood that some of the Gentiles’ practices were particularly offensive to their Jewish brethren. James suggested a letter to the Gentile believers asking them to refrain from previous pagan practices such as eating food sacrificed to idols, sexual immorality, drinking blood, and eating the meat of strangled animals. Those requests, however, had nothing to do with doctrine or the Gentiles’ salvation; they were about refraining from customs that kept the Gentiles and Jews from eating together. Although Gentiles were not bound by the law of Moses, all believers are bound by Christ’s law of love for one another and for Him.

Two simple lessons are found in Acts 15. The first is that while there are many opinions, there is only one truth. Concession is never right when it compromises the essential truth of God’s Word! Refusing to bend to the opinion of the legalists, the new church held firmly to the truth that salvation is by grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ alone. Second, when it is a matter of opinion or preference, there is plenty of room among believers for concession and compromise. A small concession on the part of the Gentiles kept the church united as both Jewish and Gentile believers broke bread together.

Today’s church continues to be bound by Christ’s law of love. Let us remember that tolerance of one another’s preferences and opinions, as long as they don’t compromise doctrine, is as essential in today’s church as it was in the 1st century.

In essentials unity, in non-essentials liberty, in all things charity. [Rupertus Meldenius]

Always be humble and gentle. Be patient with each other, making allowance for each other’s faults because of your love. Make every effort to keep yourselves united in the Spirit, binding yourselves together with peace. For there is one body and one Spirit, just as you have been called to one glorious hope for the future. There is one Lord, one faith, one baptism, one God and Father of all, who is over all, in all, and living through all. [Ephesians 4:1-6 (NLT)]

Copyright ©2023 jsjdevotions. All rights reserved.